|

A general view of Har Homa settlement, built on the land of West
Bank city of Bethlehem, and considered by Israel to be part of
'Greater Jerusalem', 29 November 2006. (MaanImages/Magnus
Johansson)
On this stage, not so long ago,
I claimed that Israel is conducting
genocidal policies in the Gaza Strip. I hesitated a lot
before using this very charged term and yet decided to adopt it.
Indeed, the responses I received, including from some leading
human rights activists, indicated a certain unease over the usage
of such a term. I was inclined to rethink the term for a while,
but came back to employing it today with even stronger conviction:
it is the only appropriate way to describe what the Israeli army
is doing in the Gaza Strip.
On 28 December 2006, the Israeli human rights organization
B'Tselem published its annual report about the Israeli atrocities
in the occupied territories. Israeli forces killed this last year
six hundred and sixty citizens. The number of Palestinians killed
by Israel last year tripled in comparison to the previous year
(around two hundred). According to B'Tselem, the Israelis killed
one hundred and forty one children in the last year. Most of the
dead are from the Gaza Strip, where the Israeli forces demolished
almost 300 houses and slew entire families. This means that since
2000, Israeli forces killed almost four thousand Palestinians,
half of them children; more than twenty thousand were wounded.
B'Tselem is a conservative organization, and the numbers may be
higher. But the point is not just about the escalating intentional
killing, it is about the trend and the strategy. As 2007
commences, Israeli policymakers are facing two very different
realities in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. In the former, they
are closer than ever to finishing the construction of their
eastern border. Their internal ideological debate is over and
their master plan for annexing half of the West Bank is being
implemented at an ever-growing speed. The last phase was delayed
due to the promises made by Israel, under the Road Map, not to
build new settlements. Israel found two ways of circumventing this
alleged prohibition. First, it defined a third of the West Bank as
Greater Jerusalem, which allowed it to build within this new
annexed area towns and community centers. Secondly, it expanded
old settlements to such proportions so that there was no need to
build new ones. This trend was given an additional push in 2006
(hundreds of caravans were installed to mark the border of the
expansions, the planning schemes for the new towns and
neighborhoods were finalized and the apartheid bypass roads and
highway system completed). In all, the settlements, the army
bases, the roads and the wall will allow Israel to annex almost
half of the West Bank by 2010. Within these territories there will
be a considerable number of Palestinians, against whom the Israeli
authorities will continue to implement slow and creeping transfer
policies -- too boring as a subject for the western media to
bother with and too elusive for human rights organizations to make
a general point about them. There is no rush; as far as the
Israelis are concerned, they have the upper hand there: the daily
abusive and dehumanizing mixed mechanisms of army and bureaucracy
is as effective as ever in contributing its own share to the
dispossession process.
The strategic thinking of Ariel Sharon that this policy is far
better than the one offered by the blunt 'transferists' or ethnic
cleansers, such as Avigdor Liberman's advocacy, is accepted by
everyone in the government, from Labor to Kadima. The petit
crimes of state terrorism are also effective as they enable
liberal Zionists around the world to softly condemn Israel and yet
categorize any genuine criticism on Israel's criminal policies as
anti-Semitism.
On the other hand, there is no clear Israeli strategy as yet for
the Gaza Strip; but there is a daily experiment with one. Gaza, in
the eyes of the Israelis, is a very different geo-political entity
from that of the West Bank. Hamas controls Gaza, while Abu Mazen
seems to run the fragmented West Bank with Israeli and American
blessing. There is no chunk of land in Gaza that Israel covets and
there is no hinterland, like Jordan, to which the Palestinians of
Gaza can be expelled. Ethnic cleansing is ineffective here.
The earlier strategy in Gaza was ghettoizing the Palestinians
there, but this is not working. The ghettoized community continues
to express its will for life by firing primitive missiles into
Israel. Ghettoizing or quarantining unwanted communities, even if
they were regarded as sub-human or dangerous, never worked in
history as a solution. The Jews know it best from their own
history. The next stages against such communities in the past were
even more horrific and barbaric. It is difficult to tell what the
future holds for the Gaza population, ghettoized, quarantined,
unwanted and demonized. Will it be a repeat of the ominous
historical examples or is a better fate still possible?
Creating the prison and throwing the key to the sea, as UN
Special Reporter John Dugard has put it, was an option the
Palestinians in Gaza reacted against with force as soon as
September 2005. They were determined to show at the very least
that they were still part of the West Bank and Palestine. In that
month, they launched the first significant, in number and not
quality, barrage of missiles into the Western Negev. The shelling
was a response to an Israeli campaign of mass arrests of Hamas and
Islamic Jihad activists in the Tul Karem area. The Israelis
responded with operation 'First Rain'. It is worth dwelling for a
moment on the nature of that operation. It was inspired by the
punitive measures inflicted first by colonialist powers, and then
by dictatorships, against rebellious imprisoned or banished
communities. A frightening show of the oppressor's power to
intimidate preceded all kind of collective and brutal punishments,
ending with a large number of dead and wounded among the victims.
In 'First Rain', supersonic flights were flown over Gaza to
terrorize the entire population, succeeded by the heavy
bombardment of vast areas from the sea, sky and land. The logic,
the Israeli army explained, was to create pressure so as to weaken
the Gaza community's support for the rocket launchers. As was
expected, by the Israelis as well, the operation only increased
the support for the rocket launchers and gave impetus to their
next attempt. The real purpose of that particular operation was
experimental. The Israeli generals wished to know how such
operations would be received at home, in the region and in the
world. And it seems that instantly the answer was 'very well';
namely, no one took an interest in the scores of dead and hundreds
of wounded Palestinians left behind after the 'First Rain'
subsided.
|
 |
|
The bar set continually higher:
Palestinians pass by a pool of blood after the Israeli
shelling of a residential area in Beit Hanoun in the
northern of Gaza Strip in which at least 18 people were
killed, 8 November 2006. (MaanImages/Wesam
Saleh) |
And hence since 'First Rain' and until June 2006, all
the following operations were similarly modeled. The difference
was in their escalation: more firepower, more causalities and more
collateral damage and, as to be expected, more Qassam missiles in
response. Accompanying measures in 2006 were more sinister means
of ensuring the full imprisonment of the people of Gaza through
boycott and blockade, with which the EU is still shamefully
collaborating.
The capture of Gilad Shalit in June 2006 was irrelevant in the
general scheme of things, but nonetheless provided an opportunity
for the Israelis to escalate even more the components of the
tactical and allegedly punitive missions. After all, there was
still no strategy that followed the tactical decision of Ariel
Sharon to take out 8,000 settlers whose presence complicated
'punitive' missions and whose eviction made him almost a candidate
for the Nobel Peace Prize. Since then, the 'punitive' actions
continue and become themselves a strategy.
The Israeli army loves drama and therefore also escalated the
language. 'First Rain' was replaced by 'Summer Rains', a general
name that was given to the 'punitive' operations since June 2006
(in a country where there is no rain in the summer, the only
precipitation that one can expect are showers of F-16 bombs and
artillery shells hitting people of Gaza).
'Summer Rains' brought a novel component: the land invasion into
parts of the Gaza Strip. This enabled the army to kill citizens
even more effectively and to present it as a result of heavy
fighting within dense populated areas, an inevitable result of the
circumstances and not of Israeli policies. With the close of
summer came operation 'Autumn Clouds' which was even more
efficient: on 1 November 2006, in less than 48 hours, the Israelis
killed seventy civilians; by the end of that month, with
additional mini operations accompanying it, almost two hundred
were killed, half of them children and women. As one can see from
the dates, some of the activity was parallel to the Israeli
attacks on Lebanon, making it easier to complete the operations
without much external attention, let alone criticism.
From 'First Rain' to 'Autumn Clouds' one can see escalation in
every parameter. The first is the disappearance of the distinction
between civilian and non-civilian targets: the senseless killing
has turned the population at large to the main target for the
army's operation. The second one is the escalation in the means:
employment of every possible killing machines the Israeli army
possesses. Thirdly, the escalation is conspicuous in the number of
casualties: with each operation, and each future operation, a much
larger number of people are likely to be killed and wounded.
Finally, and most importantly, the operations become a strategy --
the way Israel intends to solve the problem of the Gaza Strip.
A creeping transfer in the West Bank and a measured genocidal
policy in the Gaza Strip are the two strategies Israel employs
today. From an electoral point of view, the one in Gaza is
problematic as it does not reap any tangible results; the West
Bank under Abu Mazen is yielding to Israeli pressure and there is
no significant force that arrests the Israeli strategy of
annexation and dispossession. But Gaza continues to fire back. On
the one hand, this would enable the Israeli army to initiate more
massive genocidal operations in the future. But there is also the
great danger, on the other, that as happened in 1948, the army
would demand a more drastic and systematic 'punitive' and
collateral action against the besieged people of the Gaza Strip.
|
 |
|
A source of satisfaction for Israel:
Palestinians inspect a burnt vehicle belonging to Colonel
Mohammad Ghareeb, the deputy chief of preventive security in
Jabalia refugee camp in the northern Gaza Strip. The vehicle
was burnt during factional clashes between Fatah and Hamas.
(MaanImages/Wesam
Saleh) |
Ironically, the Israeli killing machine has rested lately. Even
relatively large number of Qassam missiles, including one or two
quite deadly ones, did not stir the army to action. Though the
army's spokesmen say it shows 'restraint', it never did in the
past and is not likely to do so in the future. The army rests, as
its generals are content with the internal killing that rages on
in Gaza and does the job for them. They watch with satisfaction
the emerging civil war in Gaza, which Israel foments and
encourages. From Israel's point of view it does not really mater
how Gaza would eventually be demographically downsized, be it by
internal or Israeli slaying. The responsibility of ending the
internal fighting lies of course with the Palestinian groups
themselves, but the American and Israeli interference, the
continued imprisonment, the starvation and strangulation of Gaza
are all factors that make such an internal peace process very
difficult. But it will take place soon and then with the first
early sign that it subsided, the Israeli 'Summer Rains' will fall
down again on the people of Gaza, wreaking havoc and death.
And one should never tire of stating the inevitable political
conclusions from this dismal reality of the year we left behind
and in the face of the one that awaits us. There is still no other
way of stopping Israel than besides boycott, divestment and
sanctions. We should all support it clearly, openly,
unconditionally, regardless of what the gurus of our world tell us
about the efficiency or raison d'etre of such actions. The UN
would not intervene in Gaza as it does in Africa; the peace noble
laureates would not enlist to its defense as they do for causes in
Southeast Asia. The numbers of people killed there are not
staggering as far as other calamities are concerned, and it is not
a new story -- it is dangerously old and troubling. The only soft
point of this killing machine is its oxygen lines to 'western'
civilization and public opinion. It is still possible to puncture
them and make it at least more difficult for the Israelis to
implement their future strategy of eliminating the Palestinian
people either by cleansing them in the West Bank or genociding
them in the Gaza Strip.
*Ilan Pappe is senior lecturer in the University of Haifa
Department of political Science and Chair of the Emil Touma
Institute for Palestinian Studies in Haifa. His books include,
among others,
The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict
(London and New York 1992),
The Israel/Palestine Question
(London and New York 1999), A History of Modern Palestine
(Cambridge 2003),
The Modern Middle East
(London and New York 2005) and his latest,
Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
(2006). |