|
Back to
Opinions Page
Accountability?without a doubt -- unless you are Ariel Sharon, in which
case you may freely conduct assassinations, build walls and settlements,
oppress an entire population and then be rewarded with unquestioning
support.
Until the
Bush-Sharon press conference on April 14, I was the chief negotiator for
the Palestine Liberation Organization, the only internationally
recognized entity that has a mandate to negotiate a
permanent peace
with Israel. But then Bush appeared on television, standing at the White
House next to a beaming Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel, and
announced that he had accepted Israel's claim to illegally occupied
Palestinian land. He further determined that Palestinian refugees would
never be allowed to return to their homes in Israel and would instead
have to be resettled in a Palestinian state, vast tracts of which he had
just given away.
In so doing,
Bush reneged on the 1991 U.S. Letter of Assurances provided to the
Palestinians by his father's administration; the letter said that "no
party should take unilateral actions that seek to predetermine issues"
and that "the United States has opposed and will continue to oppose
settlement activity in the territories occupied in 1967." Bush, as the
self-appointed Palestinian negotiator, finally exposed the "Middle East
peace process" for the charade that it has become -- a mechanism by
which Israel and the United States impose a solution on the
Palestinians.
In this era of
unmatched and unchallenged U.S. power, Bush abandoned
America's historical role as
facilitator and mediator of Middle East peace and instead simply adopted
the positions of an expansionist, right-wing government in Israel. It is
mind-boggling that an American president, often citing the rule of law,
would use the power of his position not to enforce international law
against illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territory
but instead to legitimize them as "currently existing Israeli population
centers," thereby giving Israelis an incentive to build even more. It is
mind boggling that a president who supports equality and
non-discrimination would dismiss the rights of Christian and Muslim
refugees to return to their homes in the "Jewish state" -- a term often
repeated but never defined or even left to the parties to negotiate. And
it is mind-boggling that the leader of the free world, the president of
a nation whose very existence is based on liberty and justice, would act
so callously to deny liberty and justice to the Palestinian people.
The positions
taken by Bush are completely contrary to, and thus seriously undermine,
the expressed objectives of American policy of democratic reform in the
Middle East. Freedom? Of course -- unless you are a Palestinian, in
which case your rights must be approved by Israel. The rule of law?
Absolutely -- unless you are Israel, in which case you need not concern
yourself with U.N. resolutions, the Fourth Geneva Convention,
international refugee law or human rights treaties.
Accountability?
Without a doubt -- unless you are Ariel Sharon, in which case you may
freely conduct assassinations, build walls and settlements, oppress an
entire population and then be rewarded with unquestioning support.
Bush wants to
reform the Arab world while serving the Washington a franchise for an
Israeli government bent on the expropriation of Palestinian land and the
domination and humiliation of the Palestinian people. As long as the
United States refuses to play an evenhanded role in the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as long as it continues to cede its Middle
East policy to the Israeli government, U.S. efforts to win the war on
terrorism are seriously undermined.
Israel's non-negotiated
disengagement from Gaza will cause many Palestinians to conclude that
violence, and not negotiations, is the only option for securing their
rights. The majority of Palestinians who support a peaceful, negotiated
two-state solution now see that Palestinians are no longer even welcome
at the negotiating table. Israel is now negotiating peace with the
United States -- not with the Palestinians. It is impossible to describe
how deeply this has undermined Palestinian moderates, such as myself,
who have continued to argue for a solution that is based on
reconciliation and negotiation and not on revenge and retaliation.
The primary
beneficiaries of these developments are extremist groups throughout the
Middle East. The leaders of such groups could not have invented a better
method of recruitment than the Bush-Sharon press conference. The reality
is that as a result of the positions taken by the Bush administration,
we are farther away from a permanent peace than we have ever been, and
many innocent people on both sides will die in the coming months and
years as a result.
My role as chief
Palestinian negotiator may have been taken from me, but I retain my role
as a Palestinian father. I am determined to teach my children that
violence is not the answer. President Bush has not made my job any
easier.
* The writer is chief negotiator for the
Palestine
Liberation Organization. |