|
Back to
Opinions Page
|
 |
|
Israeli army amasses troops near the border with the Gaza Strip,
June 27, 2006. (MaanImages/Moti
Milrod) |
When I first heard about the Israeli soldier who was
"kidnapped" by Palestinians and heard the appeal of Abu Mazen to the
Palestinian factions, followed by many other Arab and foreign leaders,
calling for his release, I thought that the soldier was kidnapped from a
coffee shop in Tel Aviv. This feeling was emphasised when I heard the
Israeli army spokesman talking to Al-Jazeera, calling upon the
kidnappers to save his life and send him back to his family and parents.
I finally realized this was not the case, when I read on the BBC that
"the missing man was the gunner on a tank attacked in a pre-dawn raid by
militants from a 300 metre tunnel under the Gaza border fence near the
Kerem Shalom crossing." Calling him a "man" and not a "soldier",
however, confused me a bit.
I learned that this soldier/man (not to upset
the BBC) was kidnapped in a battle at a military checkpoint inside the
green line. Since he is a gunner on a tank, I assume he has participated
in shelling Gaza and is probably responsible for the deaths of some
civilians, maybe even children and picnickers on the Gaza shoreline.
Israel immediately and as usual blamed the incident on the Palestinian
Authority, including the President, although the incident involved the
military and not civilians.
The Associated Press wrote: "Despite Abbas' ongoing efforts to pressure
his Hamas rivals into moderation, Olmert said he blamed the entire
Palestinian leadership, including the president, responsible for the
spiraling violence."
"It should be clear that we see the Palestinian Authority on all its
levels, from the chairman on downward, as the responsible element for
this operation and all that happens from it," Olmert said, referring to
Abbas.
Later I found out that the soldier, besides
being an Israeli, is also a French citizen. The French government was
alerted and announced that they will do their best to save the life of
the soldier and bring him back to his beloved family and friends - a
French citizen serving in illegally occupied territories violating the
Fourth Geneva Convention, to which France is a signatory. I am not sure
about the official position of the French government, but as far as I am
aware, they usually encourage their citizens not to be in the West Bank
or Gaza. So I really cannot understand how the French government can in
this case endorse the presence in Gaza of a French citizen who is not
there for a picnic, but deliberately violating international law.
I admit that I am a non-violent person. I
disagree with all violent activities and don't believe that any conflict
can or should be solved by force and violence. Yet I also fully believe
in International Law, which gives occupied people the right to resist
their occupiers by all means. Gaza, just like the rest of the West Bank
and East Jerusalem, is still under occupation and not liberated, or
"contested" as Israel and some media try to say.
Back in 2004, well before Israel’s unilateral
disengagement from Gaza took place, the United Nations Commission on
Human Rights’ Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the
Occupied Palestinian Territories, Prof. John Dugard wrote in his
official report to the Commission:
"Israel does not plan to relinquish its grasp
on the Gaza Strip. It plans to retain ultimate control over Gaza by
controlling its borders, territorial sea and airspace. Consequently, it
will in law remain an Occupying Power still subject to obligations under
the Fourth Geneva Convention".
In his latest briefing following his 9-17
June 2006 visit to the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Prof. Dugard
wrote:
"Gaza is under siege. Israel controls its
airspace and has resumed sonic booms, which terrorize and traumatize its
people. The targeted killing of militants is on the increase.
Inevitably, as in the past, such killings have resulted in the killing
and wounding of innocent bystanders. Israel also controls Gaza's
territorial sea and fires missiles into the territory from ships at
sea...Within Gaza, medical services have been seriously affected by the
prohibition on the funding of medical equipment and medical supplies
managed by the Hamas-led Palestinian Authority. The non-payment of
salaries to Palestinian Authority employees has affected both hospitals
and schools as employees cannot afford to travel to work. Unemployment
and poverty are on the increase. After a long period of closure of the
Karni commercial crossing, this crossing has been re-opened but it still
processes only a limited number of trucks with the result that Gaza is
still short of basic foodstuffs and is unable to export its produce."
To make matters worse, when a military
spokesman was asked by Al-Jazeera whether Israel will stop its planned
invasion of Gaza should the soldier be released, he said that these were
two different stories. In other words Gaza will be invaded one way or
the other. According to Israeli daily, Yediot Ahronot, the invasion of
Gaza was planned much earlier than the kidnapping of the soldier. This
means not only will child prisoners not be released in exchange for the
soldier’s life, but more children will most likely be killed in the
coming invasion.
Thus, the Palestinian president and the other regional and international
leaders are in effect asking for the release of the soldier but at the
same time for Gazans to prepare themselves for a widespread Israeli
invasion. The message is that Palestinians should not resist - they
should just wait for the Israelis in their homes, schoolyards and on the
streets, ready to die. Palestinians should not defend themselves or
defend their children; they simply need to wait to be killed without
resistance because any resistance, even if it comes from a victim, is an
act of terror.
Meanwhile, Associated Press and Reuters
wrote:
"… the soldier's family broke its silence on
Monday to plead with his captors to treat him humanely and to remember
he has a loving family who misses him dearly. Noam Shalit, in an
interview with Associated Press Television, described his son as a
quiet, helpful boy who followed his older brother into the military’s
armored corps. 'The only thing we have left right now is hope, nothing
more,' he said."
Reading these heartbreaking lines pushed me to compare this with what a
Palestinian mother had said on Al-Jazeera, following a recent shelling
by Israel, when she stated that the very concept of hope has been erased
from her consciousness.
What the Shalit family is feeling now is exactly how most Palestinian
families are feeling or have felt at one time. All Israelis need to know
that. They need to know that Palestinians are humans just like them.
Palestinians mourn when their children are killed and they feel
desperate when their children are imprisoned. This vicious cycle of
violence needs to be stopped. Israel should end its occupation for once
and for ever and not leave any outstanding issues as it usual does. They
should fully withdraw from Gaza and the West bank including East
Jerusalem and give the Palestinians their political and economic rights.
Israelis need to give Palestinians the chance to live next to them in
prosperity and peace – a just peace.
Kidnapping an Israeli soldier will not bring us one inch closer to
peace, yet neither will Israeli revenge attacks, pre-emptive attacks
or collective punishment, like cutting food supplies, electricity or
water. The only Israeli logical response which would satisfy the
Shalit family and other bereaved Israeli and Palestinian families
would be to end the occupation. The time is now. The time has always
been now – Israel, when will you learn?
* Rifat Odeh Kassis is a Palestinian
human rights activist and president of Defense for Children
International. |